Accessibility, employment, journey to work, labor, rurality, and transportation


Employment and economic growth in rural areas as a policy issue has been recently highlighted by the federal government. In August 2011, the White House released a report entitled “Jobs and Economic Security for Rural America. While the document listed various programs and policies that have reportedly benefited rural America, it also stated that rural communities are still facing many challenges. For example, many rural communities have lower incomes and higher poverty rates than more urban areas. One possible reason for rural communities being at a disadvantage compared to urban areas involves transportation, especially in terms of journey to work. Thus, one can ask how employment rates vary with accessibility, as measured by journey to work times, as well as location (rural versus urban). Using 2007 state level data, OLS analysis is used to examine the relationship between employment rates and journey to work times and rurality. The analysis confirms that employment rates decrease with increased journey to work times. However, measures of rurality were only marginally significant and the negative coefficient on each measure indicates that employment rates decrease with greater urbanization. Improving accessibility between (very) rural and larger areas might improve employment opportunities. Although weighing the benefits of such (reduced unemployment) against the costs of providing better highways or public transit might lead to a different conclusion.

Full Text : PDF

  • Baum, Charles L. (2009) ‘The Effects of Vehicle Ownership on Employment, ‘Journal of Human Resources, vol. 66, no. 3,pp. 151–163.
  • Ciccone, Antonio and Robert E. Hall. (1996) ‘Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,’American Economic Review,vol. 86, no. 1,pp. 54-70.
  • Glenn, Paul, IngeThorsen, and Jan Uboe. (2004) ‘Wage Payoffs and Distance Deterrence in the Journey to Work,’Transportation Research Part B,vol. 38, pp. 853-867.
  • Goetz, Stephan J., Yicheol Han, Jill L. Findeis and Kathryn J. Brasier. (2010), ‘US Commuting Networks and Economic Growth: Measurement and Implications for Spatial Policy,’Growth and Change, vol.41, no. 2,pp. 276-302.
  • Jelavich, Mark. (1995)‘Estimation of Structural Differences Between Rural North and South Missouri,’Transactions, Missouri Academy of Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 56-65.
  • LeSage, James P. and R. Kelley Pace.(2008)‘Spatial Econometric Modelling of Origin-Destination Flows,’Journal of Regional Science, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 941-967.
  • Partridge, M. and Rickman, D. (2006)The Geography of American Poverty, Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Partridge, Mark D., MD Kamar Ali, and M. Rose Olfert. (2010)‘Rural-to-Urban Commuting: Three Degrees of Integration,’Growth and Change, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 303-335.
  • Partridge, Mark D., Dan S. Rickman, and Hui Li. (2009)‘Who Wins From Local Economic Development?,’Economic Development Quarterly,vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 13-27.
  • Richardson, H. (1977)The New Urban Economics: And Alternatives.London: Pion.
  • Shelton, Ellen, Greg Owen, Amy B. Stevens, Justin Nelson-Christinedaughter, Corrina Roy, and June Heineman. (2002)‘Whose Job is it: Employers’ Views on Welfare Reform,’ in Weber, B., Duncan, G., and Whitener L., (2002) Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform, Kalamazoo:W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Stimson, R., Stough, R., and Roberts, B. (2006) Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Planning Strategy, 2nd edition, New York: Springer.
  • White House Rural Council. (2011) Jobs and Economic Security for Rural America, Washington, D.C.: White House.