IJBED
Print ISSN 2051-848X Online ISSN 2051-8498 ICO Registration Number: ZA522255
Accepting submissions

Article Details

Volume 14 Issue 01

Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01 
Published: 03 Apr 2026 Issue:Volume 14 Issue 01 May 2026 DOI ready Author details below

Juan Carlos Botello

Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla (UPAEP), Maxico

Mariana Echeagaray Santibanez

Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla (UPAEP), Maxico

Download PDF Reading View How to Cite BibTeX / RIS XML Metadata JSON Metadata View Issue
Share

Article Metrics Report

Views, downloads, citations, engagement

Cited by

Current citation count

Research summary

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a key indicator of regional economic dynamism, especially in countries characterized by structural disparities such as Mexico. This study examines the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows received by Mexican states and variables including Gross Domestic Product (GDP), perceived insecurity, regional competitiveness, and geographic location. A multiple linear regression model was applied to data from 2019 to 2023, incorporating regional dummy variables to capture location-specific effects.

The results reveal a clear and consistent advantage for northern regions—particularly the Northeast, Northwest, and North Center—in attracting investment, even after controlling for GDP levels, insecurity perception, and competitiveness. These regions concentrate on the highest FDI inflows and display positive and relevant coefficients in the model, suggesting a more favorable institutional, economic, and logistical environment. In contrast, regions such as the South Center, Southwest, and Southeast exhibit negative or statistically weak coefficients, pointing to a lower structural capacity to attract capital. This may be attributed to longstanding limitations in infrastructure, connectivity, political stability, and institutional development.

This pattern reflects a well-documented trend in economic literature: the persistent territorial inequality between northern and southern Mexico. Such disparity stems from both historical legacies of centralized development models and the lack of continuity in public policies aimed at regional advancement. The study confirms that geographic location is not merely a spatial variable but an economic determinant perpetuating investment distribution asymmetries. Therefore, it is essential to promote regionally differentiated development strategies that not only enhance competitiveness indicators in the south but also foster institutional and security conditions conducive to sustained national and foreign investment.

Article History

Published 03 Apr 2026

How to Cite

Botello, J. C. & Santibanez, M. E.. (2026). Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 14 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01

Citation Context

Archive cited by No internal citing article yet
Reference depth 18 sources listed
DOI record Cross-platform DOI available
Citation signal Citation exports and metadata ready

APA

Botello, J. C. & Santibanez, M. E.. (2026). Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 14 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01

MLA

Botello, Juan Carlos, and Mariana Echeagaray Santibanez. "Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 14 Issue 01, 2026. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01

Chicago

Juan Carlos Botello and Mariana Echeagaray Santibanez. "Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 14 Issue 01 (03 Apr 2026). https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01

Harvard

Botello, J. C. & Santibanez, M. E. (2026) Competitiveness, perception of insecurity, and location: Key factors in the regional distribution of foreign investment in Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 14 Issue 01. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V014N01/ART-01

References

  • Aguila-Retureta, J. (2015). *Regional disparities and industrial clusters in Mexico.* Mexico City: UNAM.
  • Botello; Juan (2025). *The role of state competitiveness and perceived insecurity in attracting foreign direct investment in Mexico*, IJBED , Volume 13 Issue 01

  • Christaller, W. (1933). *Central places in Southern Germany.* Jena: Gustav Fischer.
  • Fujita, M. (1996). Economics of agglomeration. *Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10*(4), 339–378.
  • Hamel, G. (1985). *The multinational corporation and global production strategies.* Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Henderson, J.V., Kuncoro, A., & Turner, M. (1992). Industrial development and the concentration of manufacturing. *The Review of Economic Studies, 59*(3), 479–496.
  • Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad (IMCO). (2023). *Competitiveness Index 2023.* Mexico City: IMCO.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2023). *Foreign Direct Investment Data 2019–2023.* Mexico City: INEGI.
  • Jordaan, J.A. (2024). *Industrial agglomeration and regional inequality in Mexico: 1950–2019.* Mexico City: El Colegio de México.
  • Krugman, P. (1991). *Geography and trade.* Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Krugman, P. (1999). The role of scale economies in economic geography. *International Economic Review, 40*(2), 223–247.
  • Manet, C. (2014). *Urban economies and globalization.* Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Myrdal, G. (1957). *Economic theory and underdeveloped regions.* London: Duckworth.
  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). (2020). *United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA).* Washington, D.C.: USTR.
  • Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de “pôle de croissance.” *Économie Appliquée, 8*(1), 307–320.
  • Puga, D. (1999). The rise and fall of regional inequalities. *European Economic Review, 43*(2), 303–334.
  • Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2005). Regional disparities and economic growth in Mexico. *World Development, 33*(3), 513–530.
  • Thünen, J.H. von. (1966). *Isolated state: An analysis of agriculture and economics.* Oxford: Pergamon Press.  Weber, A. (1909). *Theory of the location of industries.* Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Wolman, H. (2010). Clusters and regional inequality. *Economic Development Quarterly, 24*(1), 23–36.

Related Articles

The role of state competitiveness and perceived insecurity in attracting foreign direct investment in Mexico
The crowding effects of foreign direct investment on domestic investment: Evidence from Asia
The impact of entry modes of Foreign Direct Investment towards unemployment: Evidence from Asian countries
How does Colombia attract foreign direct investment?

Browse Articles

Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling
Export and import-led growth: the Mexican case
Green business practices and sustainability of small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs) in a Ghanaian Municipality: A global south context
Circular economy practices for sustainable urban development: A Systematic literature review of real estate sector pathways toward SDG 11 in Dhaka, Bangladesh
The WEMPOWERMENT Scorecard: A contextual tool for assessing women’s entrepreneurial empowerment in developing economies
Artificial Intelligence and labour market polarisation in India: Strategies for workforce reskilling