Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM)
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
The organizational and digital transformation projects are very complex to finalize, because of many reasons, and they mainly depend on the initial project’s phases. The initial phases depend on the critical Building Blocks (BB) based Reorganizational Process’ (RP) success, knowing that the Unbundling Process (UP) success and the deliverance of pool(s) of extracted and refined BBs, is the most important phase. BBs are combined to offer reusable Composite BBs (CBB), which are used to (re)build and optimize Organization’s Units (OU) Platform (OUP). The optimization of OUs takes into account mainly intangible and non-financial objectives. The Enterprise’s (ENT) RP is a sequence (or a set) of RPs on the OUP (RPOUP), which goal is to disassemble ENT’s: Legacy OUs’ archaic structure(s), Organizational processes, Information system’s administration, Resources/Artefacts, Applications/Modules, Working models, and Components; into dynamic reusable CBBs which can be (re)used in standardized or In-House-Implemented (IHI) Organizational BBs (OBB); where a OU is a set of OBBs and different OUs can share OBBs, and hence CBBs. The conversion of the legacy OUs and their subsystems need an IHI Methodology, Domain, and Technology Common Artefacts Standard (MDTCAS) that maps to existing BBs, CBBs and OOBs. In generating Micro-Artifacts (MA) the RP can face major difficulties because of the ENT’s heterogenous human profiles/cultures, system parts, OU’s Resistances (OUR), managers/stakeholders exaggerated financial ambitions, and project’s limited time/budgets. In this chapter the author uses an adapted version of the Applied Holistic Mathematical Model (AHMM) for DEOM (AHMM4DEOM) (Trad, & Kalpić, 2020a) to support RPOUP’s feasibility that uses the initial phase’s pool of secured BBs that result from the Automated Refine Processes (ARP) based UP (Trad, 2023b). OU is a set of OBBs, and a Dynamic Enterprise Organizational Models (DEOM) is a set of OUs; and finally, an ENT is a set of OUs.
Article History
How to Cite
Phd, A. T.. (2023). Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM). International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 11 Issue 01.
Citation Context
APA
Phd, A. T.. (2023). Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM). International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 11 Issue 01.
MLA
Phd, Antoine Trad. "Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM)." International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 11 Issue 01, 2023.
Chicago
Antoine Trad, Phd. "Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM)." International Journal of Business and Economic Development Volume 11 Issue 01 (29 May 2023).
Harvard
Phd, A. T. (2023) Organizational and digital transformation projects-A dynamic en-terprise organizational models (DEOM). International Journal of Business and Economic Development, Volume 11 Issue 01
References
- Bishop, M. (2009). Standish Group CHAOS Report: Worst Project Failure Rate in a Decade. USA. Standish Group.
- Bizzdesign (2022). Digital Transformation. Bizzdesign.
- https://bizzdesign.com/blog-category/digital-transformation/
- Capgemini (2011). Business transformation: From crisis response to radical changes that will create tomorrow’s business. A Capgemini Consulting survey. Capgemini. France. 2009.
- Chaione (2022). Digital Transformation-The 4 Types of Digital Transformation. Chaione.com.
- Charles (2017). Hosting and Cloud Software Delivery modelled in Archimate. Agile Enterprise Architecture. https://agileea.com/2017/04/hosting-and-cloud-software-delivery-modelled-in-archimate/
- Daellenbach, H., McNickle, D. & Dye, Sh. (2012). Management Science. Decision-making through systems thinking. 2nd edition. Plagrave Macmillian. USA.
- Dick, B. (2001). Action research: action and research. Australia: Southern Cross. University Press. [21-27].
- Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M., & Damian, D. (2008). Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering-Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. F. Shull et al. (eds.). Springer.
- Eira, A. (2022). 72 Vital Digital Transformation Statistics: 2023 Spending, Adoption, Analysis & Data. FinancesOnline. https://financesonline.com/digital-transformation-statistics/
- Hosiaisluoma (2022). Holistic Enterprise Development. https://www.hosiaisluoma.fi/blog/archimate-examples
- Gartner (2005). External Service Providers' Service Oriented Architecture Frameworks and Offerings: Capgemini. Gartner. USA.
- Greefhorst, D. (2009). Using the Open Group’s Architecture Framework as a pragmatic approach to architecture. NIRIA. Jaarbeurs, Utrecht. KIVI NIRIA, afd. Informatica. Netherlands.
- IBM (2014). Service Oriented Architecture. “Smart Service Oriented Architecture: Helping businesses restructure. Where are you on the Service Oriented Architecture adoption path? IBM. USA.
- IBM (2021). About organization modeling. IBM.
- https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/order-management?topic=SSGTJF/productconcepts/c_OrganizationModeling.htm
- Kasarkod, J. (2011). Integration of SABSA Security Architecture Approaches with TOGAF ADM. InfoQ. https://www.infoq.com/news/2011/11/togaf-sabsa-integration/
- Koenig, J., Rustan, K., & Leino M. (2016). Programming Language Features for Refinement. Stanford University. USA.
- Kuwashima, K. (2014). How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making? Annals of Business Administrative Science 13 (2014) 215–230. www.gbrc.jp http://dx.doi.org/10.7880/abas.13.215. ISSN 1347-4456 Print ISSN 1347-4464. ©2014 Global Business Research Center
- Liu, A. (2022). Rumbaugh, Booch and Jacobson Methodologies. Opengenus. https://iq.opengenus.org/rumbaugh-booch-and-jacobson-methodologies/
- Luyckx, F. (2015). Advanced cycle: Advanced Delivery Management (ADM) life cycle. ARIS.
- Möhring, M., Keller, B., Schmidt, R., Sandkuhl, L., & Zimmermann, A. (2023). Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges. SN Bus Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00426-3
- Nicholas, J. (2023). Introduction to Organisational Modelling. BusinessAnalystMentor.
- https://businessanalystmentor.com/introduction-to-organisational-modelling/
- O'Riordan, B. (2021). INNOVATION-Why Transformations Fail And How They Can Succeed With People Power. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/unit4/2021/10/11/why-transformations-fail-and-how-they-can-succeed-with-people-power/#:~:text=It%20is%20a%20bold%20decision,all%20major%20transformation%20projects%20fail.
- Palermo, J., Bogard, J., Hexter, E., Hinze, M., & Skinner, M. (2012). ASP.NET Model View Control 4, in Action. MANNING. USA.
- Pavel F. (2011). Grid Database—Management, OGSA and Integration. Academy of Economic Studies Romania, Bucharest, Database Systems Journal, Vol. II, No. 2/2011, Romania.
- Peterson, S. (2011). Why it Worked: Critical Success Factors of a Financial Reform Project in Africa. Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Harvard Kennedy School.
- Pratap, & Predovich, (2020). The 2020 Gartner Magic Quadrant for IT Risk Management. Gartner.
- Quang Phu, T., & Thi Yen Thao, H. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management Implementation: The Critical Success Factors For Vietnamese Construction Companies. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Studies (JMESS). ISSN: 2458-925X. Vol. 3 Issue 2, February - 2017.
- http://www.jmess.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/JMESSP13420283.pdf
- RedHat (2022). Decision Model and Notation (DMN). RedHat. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_process_automation_manager/7.1/html/designing_a_decision_service_using_dmn_models/dmn-elements-example-con
- Rosing, M., Hove, M., Subbarao, R., & Preston, T. (2012). Combining BPM and EA in complex ERP projects (a Business Architecture discipline).
- SABSA (2020). Sherwood Applied Business Security Architecture. SABSA. https://sabsa.org/
- Sargent, J. (2021). Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2021. Gartner Inc. USA.
- https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/3-themes-surface-in-the-2021-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies
- Stitt, G., Stitt, F., Vahid, W., & Najjar, W. (2006). A Code Refinement Methodology for Performance-Improved Synthesis from C. International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD'06), November 5-9, 2006, San Jose, CA, USA.
- Standish (2011). The Chaos Reports. http://www.standish.com, Standish. USA.
- The Open Group (1999). Building Blocks. Introduction to Building Blocks. The Open Group. USA.
- The Open Group (2011a). Introduction to the Architecture Development Method (ADM). The Open Group. USA.
- The Open Group (2011b). Sample catalogs, matrices, and diagrams. The Open Group. USA.
- http://www.opengroup.org/bookstore/catalog/i093.htm.
- The Open Group (2011c). Foundation Architecture: Technical Reference Model. The Open Group. USA. http://www.opengroup.org/public/arch/p3/trm/trm_dtail.htm
- The Open Group (2021). TOGAF Model Patterns. The Open Group.
- https://sparxsystems.com/enterprise_architect_user_guide/15.2/model_domains/togaf_model_patterns.html
- Trad, A., & Kalpić, D. (2014). The Selection, Modeling and Training Framework (SMTF) for Managers in Business Innovation and Transformation Projects- An executive’s business architecture and modeling strategy. Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN 2155-7950, September 2014, Volume 5, No. 1, pp.
- Trad, A. (2015a). A Transformation Framework Proposal for Managers in Business Innovation and Business Transformation Projects-Intelligent atomic building block architecture. Journal: Procedia Computer Science, Volume 64, Pages 214-223. Elsevier.
- Trad, A. (2015b). A Transformation Framework Proposal for Managers in Business Innovation and Business Transformation Projects-An Information System's Atomic Architecture Vision. Journal: Procedia Computer Science. Volume 64, Pages 204-213. Elsevier.
- Trad, A., & Kalpić, D. (2020a). Using Applied Mathematical Models for Business Transformation. IGI Complete Author Book. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A. (2021a). Applied Holistic Mathematical Models for Dynamic Systems (AHMM4DS). Journal: International Journal of Cyber-Physical Systems (IJCPS). Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-24. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A. (2022a). Business Transformation Projects-The Role of a Transcendent Software Engineering Concept (RoTSEC). IGI Book Chapter. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A. (2022b). Business Transformation Projects-The Role of Requirements Engineering (RoRE). IGI Book Chapter. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A., & Kalpić, D. (2022c). Business Transformation Projects based on a Holistic Enterprise Architecture Pattern (HEAP)-The Basic Construction. IGI Book Chapter. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A., & Kalpić, D. (2022d). Integrating Holistic Enterprise Architecture Pattern-A Proof of Concept. IGI Book Chapter. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A. (2023a). Organizational and Digital Transformation Projects-A Mathematical Model for Building Blocks based Organizational Unbundling Process. IGI Global. USA.
- Trad, A. (2023b). Organizational and Digital Transformation Projects-A Mathematical Model for Composite and Organizational Building Blocks. CBER. UK.
- Trad, A. (2023c). Organizational Transformation Projects-The Role of Global Cyber Security and Crimes (EPSC). IGI Global. USA.
- Quinlan, C. (2015). Business Research Methods. Dublin City University. Cengage Learning. Ireland.
- Yalezo, S., Thinyane, M. (2013). Architecting and Constructing a Service Oriented Architecture Bridge for a Model View Control Platform. IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA.
- Ylimäki, T. (2008). Potential Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture. University of Jyväskylä, Information Technology Research Institute. Finland.
- Watts, S. (2020). Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR): An Introduction. BMC.
- https://www.bmc.com/blogs/dfir-digital-forensics-incident-response/